What is Common Prayer?
Americans have a fascination with things that are “one of a kind.” Perhaps that is why “common” is often taken to mean “ordinary,” “unrefined,” “plain,” “overly familiar,” or even “second rate.” When we refer to “Common Prayer,” we enter a different realm altogether. In this sense “common” refers to the property and interests of an entire community which is greater than the sum of its parts. The desire to worship God in the highest form possible is quite the opposite of “ordinary.” Another definition of “common” refers to the interests of an entire community is that it is the opposite of “private.” Whether “private” means “out of sight” or “that which is the sole property of an individual” it is outside the realm of “Common Prayer.”
Since the basic meaning of “common” in the vocabulary of religious English is “that which the people possess together in relation to God and in which they unite as his people,” “Common Prayer” is the public worship of God, in which the people of God unite in the public place of worship, the consecrated building, using an approved form of service, under the godly governance of a legitimate ecclesiastical authority, within the universal Church of Jesus Christ. This does not preclude godly devotions of a local nature. The Church or jurisdiction finds its shared identity as a coherent people of God. Thus “Common Prayer” must always come first, and then local devotions when the common work of prayer is done. The loss of true Common Prayer can also diminish the value of other sorts of prayer, local or private, because there is no longer a common model, thought, knowledge, faith, or standard by which to evaluate and improve them.
Prior to the reformation, the
term “common prayer” in
“The Book of the Common Prayer and Administration of the Sacraments and other rites and ceremonies of the Church: after the use of the Church of England” is an imposing title. The phrase “after the use of the Church of England” implies there is a form of prayer “common” to the entire Christian Church throughout the world and throughout history, in whatever language the public, regular prayers of the Church are said. What Archbishop Cranmer offered in English was meant to be a conservative document – the presentation of the “common” (understood as “universal”) prayer of the Christian Church, after the use of the Church of England.
Common Prayer has been accused of being a replacement for the thoughts and prayers of our hearts. It is rather a way of cultivating those thoughts and prayers by a corporate life of worship that forms them and directs them in a trustworthy way that gives certain glory to God. Richard Hooker argued that the preaching services of the Puritans and Presbyterians are not “common prayer.” He admits the Christian people that attend such preaching services can genuinely hear the Word of God and give assent to prayer offered to heaven by a godly preacher. Nevertheless, such services, because they are “common” to one congregation alone, and not common to the whole Church, offer little protection against un-godly preachers, and provide no guarantee that the lives of the people will be molded according to the pattern of the whole life of the Church of Jesus Christ.
One of the basic characteristics
of the traditional English (and Anglican) understanding and form of Common
Prayer has been that there is, in an Anglican formulary, only one rite provided
for each of the public services of the Church and that there is no provision
for extemporaneous prayer by the minister in those regular, public service,
apart from the prudential use of Holy Scripture and the occasional prayers
provided within the Prayer Book itself.
There is no optional rite for Holy Communion or Baptism (apart for
provisions allowing the abbreviation of the regular forms of service at the
sickbed and in times of imminent death) or for the Daily Services of Morning
and Evening Prayer. This expectation of
uniformity is no more remarkable or restraining than the expectation that all
of the Old Israel, the prototype of a national church, should use the same
Psalter in its worship or ask the same ritual questions every year at the
Passover. “Common Prayer” in the
The Book of Common Prayer is more than a translation, adaption, or
renewal of the medieval services of prayer and worship. With its weekly Lord’s Day, by its Feasts and
fasts, through the discipline and rhythms of the Church Year, 265 days a year,
every year, The Book of Common Prayer
is more than a formulary for worship. It
is a formulary for life – for the spiritual formation of the lives of the
saints on earth. The Book of Common Prayer became the
Common Prayer encompasses the
entire life of a Christian, beginning with the “Churching of Women” and its provisions
for thanking God for the entry of a child into the world. That child then enters into the life of the
From the Reformation, The Book of Common Prayer has been the
central formulary, the objective document, of what we now call “the
No edition of The Book of Common Prayer is perfect or
untouchable. But, to abandon the whole
tradition of this Prayer Book, along with all its particular editions is to
declare that the history of the Church in
For more details, read “Neither Orthodoxy Nor A Formulary” by The Rev. Dr. Peter Toon, M.A., D.Phil.
and The Rev. Louis Tarsitano
(Preservation Press of the Prayer Book Society of the USA 2004